The Reverend Lerrill White, Ph.D.
on HIPAA and PIPEDA Privacy Regulations
It’s Déjà Vu All Over Again
It seems like only yesterday that a new regulation,
known as HIPAA (The Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act), was enacted in the
United States. Instead, it was nearly a year
ago that this highly complex set of rules was
put into motion. The result has been confusion,
disruption and serious misinterpretations that
have had far-ranging affects - even on healthcare
chaplains and clergy.
Simply stated, the regulation is intended to
protect the privacy of an individual’s healthcare
records. An Emergency Department nurse may not
share a patient’s medical information with a
TV news reporter, for example, without the patient’s
express consent. A similar regulation was enacted
in Canada (PIPEDA - Personal Information Protection
and Electronic Documents Act ) a year prior to
the enactment of HIPAA. While both sets of regulations
were intended to promote the privacy of an individual’s
records (particularly financial, legal, and/or
healthcare related), it remains unclear whether
either set of regulations will accomplish their
intended goal. What is clear is that the implementation
of the regulations, based on the interpretations
and counsel of industry consultants, caused unnecessary
harm to chaplains and clergy in both countries.
These industry consultants (healthcare and legal),
reasoned in both sets of regulations (HIPAA & PIPEDA),
that chaplains evidently were not included since
they were not mentioned in the regulations. From
that line of reasoning, they proceeded to advance
the opinion that chaplains were not healthcare
workers. The result, in both Canada and the U.S.,
was the recommendation of the consultants that
chaplains should no longer function as part of
the interdisciplinary team. Many chaplains were
told they could only see patients by request
of the patient and had no access to charts or
any other patient information. Fortunately, most
healthcare administrators in the U.S. decided
to employ common sense (as suggested in HIPAA’s
Preamble) in applying the regulations. In the
end, most of these misinterpretations and overreactions
were reversed and chaplains were returned to
their rightful place on the healthcare team.
Still, we are mindful that there are chaplains
on both sides of the border whose ministries
have been seriously affected with no resolution
in sight. Regarding local clergy, there are as
many interpretations and applications of the
regulations as there are healthcare entities.
The same consultants, who wanted to eliminate
chaplains because they were not mentioned, decided
they needed to limit the local clergy’s access
to patient information because they were mentioned.
The result is ongoing disruption for clergy and
a “crazy quilt” of policies. Some hospitals are
very user friendly for local clergy while others
refuse to give clergy any information on their
hospitalized congregants.
One thing is clear. On both sides of the border,
healthcare chaplains and clergy must work together
to have members of our profession officially
recognized by government agencies as healthcare
workers. We have been passive for too long, and
we are paying a price for our lack of advocacy
and action. One piece of good news: the director
of the Office of Civil Rights in the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services said recently, “HIPAA
does not prevent clergy from getting medical
information nor should it affect prayer. A belief
persists that HIPAA is hurting the religious
community. There is miscommunication and misinterpretation
out there.” So, we know that we are now being
heard. The next step is to educate our national
policy makers.
In recent conversations with several leading
faith group representatives, Tommy Thompson,
U.S. Secretary of Health & Human Services,
indicated that changes to HIPAA, planned to go
into effect in August, 2004, will clarify the
roles of chaplain and clergy. Our professional
and religious communities need to monitor future
developments to ensure that the revised regulations
correctly represent us and our constituencies.
To read more about these two privacy laws go
to:
HIPAA – www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/
PIPEDA - http://www.privcom.gc.ca/legislation/02_06_01_01_e.asp?V+Print
The Rev. Lerrill J. White, Ph.D is assistant
director of Clinical Pastoral Education at St.
Luke’s Episcopal
Hospital in Houston, TX, and has been the liaison
to Health & Human Services for the Association
of Clinical Pastoral Education and Association
of Professional Chaplains since 1983. Do you have thoughts about professional practice
you’d like to share with your colleagues? Send
an e-mail of any length to info@PlainViews.org.
|