8/2/2006
Vol. 3, No. 13
 |
|
Professional
Practice |
Rev. Dr.
Neville A. Kirkwood on
preparing clergy and others
to face disaster
Preparation
for Disaster Care Givers
Daniel Coleman’s
article “Care for
the Care Givers”(Vol.
3, No. 12) has given me
itchy fingers.
In 1977,
a major rail disaster uncovered
the inability of many rescue
personnel and other close
workers to emotionally
cope with the horror and
extent of their suffering.
The state government realized
the need for some restructuring
of the State Emergency
Services (SES). A Welfare
and Personnel Committee
of the SES was established.
Fellow Chaplain Jim Hamilton
and I were appointed to
one of the regional subcommittees.
We were both on the executive
committee of the State
CPE Council when we realized
the need for the training
of people likely to be
involved in future emergency
situations.
We organized
seminars and workshops
and were also invited by
a university to give several
lectures to their nursing
students. A similar program
was conducted for students
training for welfare qualifications
at another university.
[1] More importantly we
organized simulated disasters
over the weekend period
with the cooperation of
the police, fire and ambulance
Services. In this program
we had 30-plus social workers,
30-plus youth and community
services district officers
and 30-plus. parish clergy.
The exercise was made as
realistic as possible,
with the last session on
Sunday being a debriefing
session.
These weekends
showed just how traumatized
the participants were even
though it was not the real
thing. Extra time had to
be spent with several who
were deeply affected. One
wondered how useful many
of them would have been
in a real emergency, yet
these individuals would
have been amongst the first
called upon to be involved
in the disaster.
When I had
opportunities to speak
to seminary students on
death education topics,
I had arrangements with
the city police for the
students to visit their
morgue. The reason for
this was to acquaint them
with death, a dead body
and the gruesomeness of
some accident scenes. This
morgue held up to 250 cadavers
at any one time. They also
had facilities in one area
for conducting 16 autopsies
at a time. Usually there
were six to eight autopsies
being conducted simultaneously.
After police
identification of the bodies
at 9:30 a.m., the students
were taken into the refrigerated
area to see the waiting
bodies, then to view the
autopsies. In the lecture
theatre, questions, reactions,
and debriefing took place.
These future clergy all
valued the experience.
Often, years later, when
visiting them in their
parishes, they reiterated
their appreciation of the
experience and how it had
equipped them to cope with
some pastoral encounters.
Chaplains
in teaching hospitals have
an opportunity to help
those training for any
community ministry to be
able to face future traumatic
scenes with strong, positive,
and helpful support. We
never know when they may
be called to witness some
roadside carnage and be
the only one able to offer
assistance before emergency
services arrive.
Chaplains
should consider the preparation
of careers to face disasters
as an important arm of
their ministry.
[1] “Welfare
qualifications”is
a Diploma of Welfare Studies
in the Humanities Department.
It was a requirement for
welfare workers in certain
government and other organisations.
Rev. Dr. Neville Kirkwood
has had a long career as
a hospital chaplain, lecturer
and preacher. He served
in a cross-cultural mission
in India and earned his
doctor of ministry degree
at San Francisco Theological
Seminary. He lives in Queensland,
Australia.
Do
you have thoughts about
professional practice you’d
like to share with your
colleagues? Send an e-mail info@PlainViews.org.
 |
|
Advocacy |
Chaplain responses make a difference
Responses
to the Spirituality/Medicine Interface
Program Make a Difference
Editor’s note: Again,
we have chosen to highlight the on-going
dialogue around the article by Dr. Hamdy
entitled, “Spirituality and Medicine”that
appeared in the June 21 issue of PlainViews (Education & Research,Vol.
3, No. 10). These responses continue to
raise this issue that is of great importance
to the profession of chaplaincy. As you
will read from APC President, Robert Kidd,
some progress has been made! Dr. Hamdy
is to be commended for his willingness
to be open to re-considering some of the
plans for the program.
It was clear that some within
the chaplaincy community were distressed
that the Southern Medical Association's Spirituality/
Medicine Interface conference did not include
professional chaplains in its faculty. After
reading the letters on this topic from APC
members, I contacted the SMA myself. Following
that conversation, during which I expressed
my pleasure at the SMA's interest in the
medicine/ spirituality connection, I also
shared chaplains' general frustration when
other medical professionals speak publicly
about spiritual care delivery without including
professional chaplains in the dialogue. During
my conversation with the SMA, I offered to
assist them in publicizing their event on
the APC website and having the conference's
content approved for CCEs. Following this
conversation, I received the following email
from Dr. Ronald Hamdy, the conference chair:
I am delighted to hear from Mandy
Stone and Jean Lambert at the Southern
Medical Association Office that you are
interested in the conference we are organizing
in September on the Spirituality/Medicine
Interface. I am particularly appreciative
of your willingness to help us get continuing
education credits for chaplains.
I wonder whether you might be interested
in moderating one of the sessions, joining
the faculty of the conference and being
a co-discussant in one or more of the
case discussions. It is too late to change
the program, but it should not be too
difficult to add a flyer to the brochure.
Please do not hesitate to contact
me should you need any further information
or wish to discuss any issue.
I look forward to hearing from you
and hopefully meeting you in Atlanta.
At this writing, I have accepted Dr. Hamdy's
invitation and will soon begin discussions
about the details of my involvement. While
I am aware that my participation on behalf
of the APC does not address the more generalized
concerns about chaplains' regular involvement
in events like this, Dr. Hamdy's invitation
is still gracious and most welcome. I see
the APC's inclusion in this event as an additional
stepping stone toward our strong collaboration
with the national medical community.
Chaplain Robert Kidd
President
Association of Professional Chaplains
I write with a somewhat different “spin”on
the issues raised about the Spirituality/Medicine
program sponsored by the Southern Medical
Association. My initial response was excitement
about the conference and an eagerness to
learn more. I will attend and still am very
eager to be a part of the conference.
I deeply share the frustration that professional
chaplains were not included in this faculty
and typically are not included in conferences
such as this. I am frustrated and territorial
when those from outside our profession claim
expertise in spiritual care and appear to
not know that chaplains exist. I do not want
physicians and nurses to increasingly claim
spiritual care as their area of expertise.
Having claimed all of this, I would like
to present some other issues for consideration:
1. The sharply worded responses for Chaplains
Wintz and LaRocca-Pitts seemed to have
elicited from Dr. Hamdy defensiveness rather
than dialogue. When my comments to a patient,
family, or staff member elicit defensiveness
I ordinarily think I have stepped over
a line and have likely become unhelpful.
I think we should not be placating but
should exercise wisdom and patience as
we seek to “find our places at the
table”.
2. What I know of Chaplain Wintz’s program and professional environment
is very different from my own. I deeply respect the thoughtful and developed
professionalism that seems to be displayed in her personal work and the apparent
organization of her department. I am a one-person department in the heart
of the Bible Belt [as is the Southern Medical Association]. My experience
is that “here”a minister is a preacher is a saver-of-souls to
most people, lay and professional alike. And there are preachers everywhere!
Issues of confusion and/or ignorance about professional expertise and collegiality
are far more deeply entrenched than mere physician and chaplain relationships.
This reality drives me crazy, but it is reality as I experience it!
3. Another reality is that “we chaplains”don’t do much
research and writing for publication. Despite frequent pleas from those few
chaplains who do research and write, those endeavors are pretty low on the
list of priorities for the chaplains I know. The profoundly inadequate patterns
of staffing for spiritual care rarely allow for comprehensive care to patients,
families, and staff; research is just too much to add to the mix. Therefore,
we don’t have much of a forum to be recognized as having important
knowledge to contribute.
4. I believe that concerns about faculty being dominated by white males and
the clear Christian reference for Dr. Koenig raised by commentators in the
7/19/06 issue of Plain Views warrant discussion. Having recently planned
a major conference, I am very aware that focus is required to meet stated
objectives. Are there non-Christian researchers who have the knowledge to
contribute to this anticipated audience that Dr. Koenig has? Each will have
to decide where the line is drawn between consciousness-raising and mere
sniping. However, again I think we need to be very careful that we don’t
jump to unwarranted conclusions about the ability of this faculty to be open
to many kinds of spirituality. We certainly don’t appreciate it when
someone uninformed about professional chaplaincy jumps to the conclusion
that a chaplain is likely to be a pushy, pious religionist because we are
ministers!
5. Finally, I believe that we must first take responsibility for ourselves
and must start where we are. Perhaps, as Dr. John Nelson suggested at the
APC conference in Atlanta, we need to seek ways to initiate more collegiality
with physicians at local, state and national levels. Perhaps we need to plan
conferences which would attract physicians to participate and experience
our expertise. As for this physician-planned conference, I plan to go and
participate as one who knows himself to be a qualified professional peer
to any and all the participants. I hope to learn something; I hope to share
myself and my experience/knowledge, and I hope to plant some seeds of collegiality.
Gary Batchelor, D. Min., BCC
Chaplain, Floyd Medical Center
Like many others, I read with disappointment
the agenda and selection of speakers for
the conference and with interest the ongoing
conversation about the intent versus actions
in the conference planning. There is an easy
remedy for Dr. Hamdy and the conference planners
to apply to this situation that would accomplish
much more than defensiveness over what was
clearly an error in planning. For each session,
invite a board-certified chaplain to respond
to the physicians’presentations in
whatever way s/he sees fit, give her/him
a fair amount of time to do so (15-20 minutes),
see to it that each respondent is provided
the text of the presentation in advance in
order to prepare a thoughtful response, and
let the dialogue genuinely begin. I would
gladly volunteer to be a respondent to one
of the presentations and I’m confident
that many other chaplains would do the same.
Jeanne Tessier Barone
NACC Certified Chaplain
Palliative Care Chaplain
Kosair Children’s Hospital
Louisville KY
I hope to attend the workshop on spirituality/medicine
interface and appreciate your invitation
to Chaplains to attend a dialogue about spirituality.
I did want to offer a couple of words of
encouragement and advice.
I went to fill out the registration for
the workshop and found the designated categories
of physician and non physician. I had a physician,
once identify medical professionals( me included)
in the same manner, and in a snit of anger
I told him that I was a Chaplain not a non
physician.
The other thing I immediately saw was the
first case study on the docket. The one in
which the patient and family wanted the family
minister to come to the hospital but the
minister was too far away so the chaplain
was called and of course the family did not
want to see the Hospital Chaplain but instead
asked the Physician to save the day by praying
with the family.
I hate to join the chorus but both examples
do not show evidence to me of an inclusive
invitation to dialogue.
If I get to attend the workshop maybe we
can talk about these perceptions.
Thank you.
Larry Austin, D.Min
ACPE Supervisor, BCC
Director of Pastoral Services
Do you have thoughts about advocacy you’d
like to share with your colleagues? Send
an e-mail to info@PlainViews.org.
 |
|
Education
& Research |
Dr. Diane Bridges on teaching our children
about life and death
Talking
with Children about Terminal Illness,
Death, Dying & Grief
As a parent, relative, friend, or chaplain, one
of the most difficult experiences is talking
with a child about someone’s terminal
illness. It doesn’t happen in a moment
or a sentence and it’s not about the
language of religion or faith traditions.
It’s all about precious, loving relationships,
security and hope. It’s about metaphors
and hugs and tears and truth and hope for
the future. It’s about holding onto
and cherishing meaningful relationships of
those touched by the process of death and
dying in the life of a child or adolescent.
It’s important to remember that perceptions
of death vary with developmental stages of
a child’s life: 3-5 years, 6-10 years,
10-18 years. You can help a child by acknowledging
his or her feelings, thoughts or fears about
what is happening. Recognize signs of confusion,
anger, acting out, silence, lack of appetite,
sleeplessness or even apparent lack of feelings.
Ask yourself what you think is most important
right now to this child in a context which
will provide hope and help while dealing
with the pain and fear. As parents we often
want to protect children from the pain of
grief. Because we have difficulty dealing
with death, we wonder how a young child could
possibly cope with it. But children can and
do! We have an enormous responsibility to
be there for them in the midst of our own
grief to ensure that they do not feel bewildered
and abandoned.
Don’t feel that you need to provide
all the answers. Feel free to speak about
what is happening, e.g., “Mommy is
very sick right now and we are giving her
all our love. Our love as a family lasts
forever and ever and we don’t need
to be afraid. We’ll help each other
and we’ll all be safe and strong together.
It’s okay to cry because we feel sad.
Crying will help us. It’s okay to laugh,
too, when we hear or see something funny.”
Be simple, direct, and honest in terms that
your child can understand. This, along with
warmth and your physical presence and affection
are so helpful. It is also important that
we reassure children that death is not contagious
and that the death of one person doesn’t
mean that someone else will die soon. During
these very difficult times try and maintain
order and stability and security in your
child’s life as much as possible.
As much as you may feel so inadequate in
the face of impending or realized death,
you have incredible parenting instincts and
you may find that your child can actually
comfort you as all of you struggle with the
realities of your losses.
Children have a great deal to teach adults
about grief and we need to encourage them
to ask questions, explore their feelings,
draw their images with color and participate
in the processes of living and dying as a
natural part of life. I have found that Leo
Buscaglia’s book The Fall of Freddie
the Leaf to be very helpful in explaining
death to young children.
Certainly there are no magical approaches
or answers. You are the front line; and there
is your circle of friends, professionals
and family members on whom you can rely.
Your personal wisdom and faith, even if they
feel shattered at the time, will eventually
enable you and your child to move forward
in hope with the strength of your love.
As a hospital chaplain, grief counsellor
and grandma in our precious family, I would
say to you very truly, “Try not to
worry about tomorrow, God is already there.”
Dr. Diane Bridges received her doctor
of ministry degree from the University of Toronto,
St. Michael's College. She is the director
of spiritual & religious care at the Trillium
Health Centre in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada,
one of Canada's top 100 employers, and is a
member of CAPPE/ACPEP and the APC. She has
authored a number of articles on bereavement
and grief recovery. Her passion is the healing
ministries.
Do you have thoughts about education & research
you’d like to share with your colleagues?
Send an e-mail to info@PlainViews.org.
 |
|
Spiritual
Development |
Chaplain Sarah Byrne on simply showing love
The
Word Became Flesh
A handsome, charming twenty-eight
year old, “Michael”, had spent
recent years living the high life. I met
Michael in the locked psychiatric unit where
I served as chaplain. Michael had attempted
to take his life the previous night.
What a soul-shock it must have been to awaken
from an anticipated death. My heart felt
full with the heaviness of his story as I
entered his room.
Once he decided that I was a non-threatening
presence, Michael shared his pain. Raised
by a zealous Christian mother, he saw her
faith as legalistic and superstitious. Michael
devoted himself to understanding his experiences
from a non-religious perspective. He took
in a confusing world and tried to formulate
a worldview from it. Not surprisingly, this,
along with a tendency toward depression and
a series of losses, led him into despair.
Michael wanted to die because he thought
life was meaningless and that, in the grand
scheme, his existence didn’t matter.
He concluded that if there was a God, He
was horribly strange, and if there wasn’t
a God, then life was utterly fleeting and
empty. Either way, non-existence seemed better.
As I sat with Michael, I felt his despair
in my body and heart. Stunningly, Michael’s
mother had yelled at him that morning, telling
him that he was now guaranteed a place in
Hell for his suicide attempt. He was vulnerable,
a wounded soul.
We cried on behalf of life lost and found.
We cried because it is easy to lose sight
of joy when the world is overwhelming. We
cried because there is so much brokenness.
We cried with questions: Should we disengage
from the struggles inside us and around us,
or live through them? Should we risk joy,
heartbreak? Where is hope, at the end of
the day, when all is still?
And I cried inside myself because sometimes
I don’t know how to speak of God when
the weight of the world is too much to bear.
I want to say something real. I want to minister
as I have been ministered to in times of
need.
But I gradually remembered, while perched
on the wooden chair beside Michael’s
bed, that I must not be a mouthful of good
intentions. I must be a whole person sharing
Michael’s space of suffering. I must,
simply, show love.
This God-given love is one thing I know
in my heart to be true. We are called to
speak it in ways beyond words. An unwavering
presence, even a silent one, would speak
volumes more than any words. No ideas for
a better life would honor the depths of Michael’s
pain or drag him out of it. No, I needed
him to know that for this day, I would stay.
No fancy words were needed. The Word was all that was needed –the indwelling
presence of God. It is a nearly silent presence, a still, small voice, a fullness
in the midst of emptiness.
This love sits with us in our grief. It
cries with us as Jesus did for Lazarus. It
speaks creation into being. It seeks us out
amidst the chaos of unknowing. This Love
stays with us in a stark, white hospital
room.
Sarah Byrne, M.Div., B.C.C., is the Chaplain
at All Care Hospice in Lynn, Massachusetts.
She is Board Certified with the APC and is
endorsed as a chaplain by the Orthodox Church
in America. She is on the board of the Women’s
Orthodox Ministry and Education Network. This
piece was originally published in the St. Nina
Quarterly, an online journal dedicated to exploring
the ministry of women in the Orthodox Church.
Do you have thoughts about spiritual development
you’d like to share with your colleagues?
Send an e-mail of any length to info@PlainViews.org.
 |
|
EthicsWalk |
EthicsWalk addresses
spiritual care as an ethical enterprise.
It explores why relationships between spiritual
care providers and those they serve need
protection, and examines what that protection
entails. PlainViews invites our
readers to share their responses to each EthicsWalk column,
which will be published in the following
issue.
If you’d like to respond to EthicsWalk,
please send a comment of no more than 100
words. You can use the e-form below (click
on "hearing from you," link) or
submit your commentary to the editors in
the body of an e-mail (or as a Microsoft
Word attachment) sent to Info@PlainViews.org.
Please put the phrase “EthicsWalk”
in your subject line.
We look forward to hearing
from you.
Anne
Underwood is on a break for the summer.
If there is a particular issue that you
would like her to write about this coming
fall, please send your ideas to: info@plainviews.org.
Anne Underwood has an undergraduate degree
in religious studies, a master’s degree in
rural sociology and a mid-life law degree obtained
after working over a decade as a college administrator.
She has mediated for the Maine family courts
since 1983. Currently she serves as an advisor
to the ethics commissions of ACPE, APC, the
CCAR (Central Conference of American Rabbis),
and NAJC, and consults with a variety of Protestant
faith communities on issues of power, fair
process, and congregational conflict management.
Her articles on mediation and restorative justice
have appeared in the ACPE News, The APC News
and on the ACPE web site. Articles on clergy
accountability and judicatory processes are
published by the Alban Institute and The
Journal on Religion and Abuse. A chapter,
“Clergy Sexual Misconduct: A Justice Issue,”
appears in Body and Soul: Rethinking Sexuality
as Justice-Love, Marvin Ellison and Sylvia
Thorson-Smith, editors, The Pilgrim Press,
2003.
 |
|
CaseConference |
We
post an ethical or situational concern
that has arisen in a facility where one
of our readers works. It has no identifiers
included. It gives you only the facts of
the case. Then, you can respond to that
concern. This is an ongoing dialogue, with
comments added as they come in. In the
following issue, assuming it has been resolved,
we give you the outcome from the facility
where the incident took place. Please send
any cases that you would like considered
for inclusion to: info@plainviews.org
We
hope that this new addition will help to
inform not only those who are dealing with
the issue, but will enable all of our readers
to learn from the experiences and perhaps
mistakes of others.
PLEASE
NOTE: Due to unanticipated continuing responses
to both the case and the resolution of
the case, added responses can be viewed
in the archives. Click HERE.
CaseConference #10
Resolution
The patient was transferred to a step down
vent unit when a critical need arose in CCU.
This move took much negotiating and discussion
with the patient's wife and son. They felt
that, if moved, he would not get sufficient
care. The family was shown the area and met
with the nurse manager. They eventually accepted
the move. The Chaplain was supportive of
the team throughout this process..
Upon transfer to a semi-private room with
another vent dependent patient, the two families
began to talk. Sometimes people sharing similar
paths minister to each other. After ministering
to her for a week to ten days, the patient’s
wife slowly began to accept the fact that
the man in the bed would never recover.
Her acceptance of his death came slowly. Still she continued to sit by his
bedside for many long hours. Some of the staff felt that once she was able
to accept that concept, she was able to lessen her hold on him and free him
from the liminal state he was in.
In the early morning hours, about two weeks
after his transfer, Mr. M. died. His wife
was not present.
CaseConference #10
Mr. M is a 65-year old male of Russian Jewish
ancestry who immigrated to the US after the
SEcond World War. End-stage renal disease
placed him on dialysis. Recently he made
the decision to go on the kidney transplant
list. In early March 2006 he suffered chest
pains. A cardiac cauterization was scheduled.
The results of this procedure showed cardiac
by-pass surgery was necessary. The following
day a quadruple cardiac by-pass was performed.
Mr. M survived surgery, however he had great
difficulty being removed form the ventilator.
Once weaned from the ventilator he had a
cardiac arrest. He was anoxic for a prolonged
period of time.
Multiple complications followed the arrest:
various infections, septic wounds, and decubetus,
repeated replacement of central lines and
feeding tubes and dialysis problems.
EEG’s have determined limited brain
activity; but is not considered brain dead.
More accurately Mr. M can be described as
existing in a permanent vegetative state
- PVS. He remains a full code. He was recently
transferred from the Coronary Acute Care
Unit to an Advanced Ventilator Step Down
Unit. His wife refuses to accept a Skilled
Nursing Facility placement.
His wife and brother keep a vigil at his
bedside during visiting hours believing he
will come back to a fullness of health. They
seek a miracle.
The family will not listen to the medical
staff as they attempt to address the issue
of withdrawal of life support.
The patient’s wife who is by training
a dentist, calls to him at all times “wake
up –come back –do not leave me.”She
has repeatedly stated that she would kill
herself if he should die, as she has “nothing.”
She refused to accept anything other than
the ministry of presence. When Psychiatry
sought to intervene, she physically ejected
the doctor from the unit. She speaks only
of her love for her husband. She feels the
hospital is not treating him aggressively
enough.
What is the chaplain's pastoral
role with the patient? The wife? The other
family? The staff?
What are the ethical issues
in this case?
What is the chaplain's role
in helping to resolve these ethical issues
with the wife? The other family? The
staff?
Please check the archives below
for comments made about the last CaseConference.
Send your comments about CaseConference
to info@PlainViews.org.
 |
|
Reviews |
Sarah
Masters reviews the documentary
Sacred Sacred
The director of this award-winning
documentary wanders the globe on a five-year
odyssey, in search of what he calls today’s “Ground
Zeroes.”Velcrow Ripper seeks individuals
who continue to hope in the dark places of
the world ranging from Bhopal to Sarajevo
to Kabul to Phnom Penh to Jerusalem.
Winner of the Special Jury Prize at the
Toronto International Film Festival, Scared
Sacred focuses on individuals driven
to turn tragedy into generosity. A child
soldier of the Khmer Rouge decommissions
land mines. A Sufi musician banned by the
Taliban from playing his lute fills his house
with songbirds. A human rights worker confronted
with the Bhopal disaster builds a unique
health clinic for victims of the toxic Union
Carbide gases.
The inspirational stories visualized over
and over through the camera lens are a reminder
for Chaplains of the resilience possible
within each human being.
Completed: 2006
Running Time: 104 Minutes
Director/Producer: Velcrow Ripper
If you are interested in purchasing
this film, you can do so at www.hartleyfoundation.org.
Just click on “Masterworks”on
the homepage for more information. The cost
of the DVD is $29.99.
Sarah Masters is the Managing
Director of the Hartley Film Foundation,
a non-profit foundation dedicated to cultivation,
support, production and distribution of
the best documentaries and audio meditations
on world religions, spirituality, ethics
and well-being.
Book
Review
The
Rev. Dr. William Zeckhausen reviews
Letters
to Sam: A Grandfather’s Lessons
on Love, Loss,
and the Gifts of Life
For twenty years, Dan has hosted a psychology
call-in radio show, “Voices in the
Family,”broadcast from Philadelphia’s
NPR affiliate. For ten years, he has written
a column for the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Through letters and persons calling in, plus
his psychotherapy practice, he has listened,
observed, and learned about the cruelties,
courage and compassion that touch us all.
And as he writes in his introduction, “Books
taught me a bit about psychology. But paralysis
taught me to sit still and keep my ears and
heart open so I could listen.”
You see, Dan has also for over twenty years
of his fifty plus years been quadriplegic.
In his introduction, Dan explains that quadriplegia
puts the body at risk, and he feared he wouldn’t
live long enough to share with his grandson
Sam lessons of life, or to be known by him.
When Sam was two, it was discovered that
he was autistic. Dan wrote: ”I wept
for Sam. I realized that I had more than
ever to tell him. . . I wanted to teach him
what I’ve learned about fighting against
the kind of adversity that I face almost
daily and fear he will face also. And I wanted
to tell him how peace often happens when
we simply stop fighting.”
I have heard Dan speak at two Healing and
Spirituality Conferences, so I know his ability
to penetrate our defenses and reach those
soft spots that many of us intentionally
or unconsciously hide, i.e., the very places
where we are most deeply human, compassionate,
sensitive, and wise. So it’s not surprising
that Dan is able to do the same in his writing.
Nor is it surprising that his publishers
believe the books coming impact will be similar
to “Tuesdays with Morrie”. David
Elpern, M.D., who has created physician wellness
conferences over 20 years that included countless
nationally recognized presenters, describes
Dan as a modern day Buddha.
At one Conference where Dan presented, he
told about how after his accident he didn’t
know if he could make it as a quadriplegic,
nor if he wanted to. But he would give it
two years, and decide whether to go on, or
check out. After two years, he had a conversation
with his god, not the god of his religion,
but of his spirit. He asked his god if god
would give him the hope that he might be
cured. His god said he wouldn’t, so
choose. He tried again, and asked his god
if he would give him the hope of good health.
And god repeated the previous answer. His
god then said to him, “There is only
one thing I expect from you, which is faithfulness,
and one thing I will promise you, which is
presence.”
Dan also said his struggle before his accident
was to be part of the “in”group.
But after the accident, when sitting in his
wheel chair, he noted that most people would
not look at him, as though he were a non-person.
He understood that. He was everyone’s
worst nightmare, being helpless and dependent,
24/7. He realized he could never be part
of the “in”group…which
freed him, to be himself.
Dan’s speaking, and his writing, have
the potential to enable us to find, enjoy,
and live our deepest self. Dan is truly a
powerful wounded healer. In Letters to Sam,
Dan writes to all of us.
Dan Gottlieb, Ph.D., Letters to Sam:
A Grandfather’s Lessons on Love,
Loss, and the Gifts of Life (New York:
Sterling, 2006) 178 pp.
The Rev. Dr. William Zeckhausen, an ordained
UCC minister, is a New Hampshire licensed pastoral
psychotherapist, and a Diplomate with the AAPC.
He was an ACPE certified supervisor for 10
years. Over the past 20 years, Bill has facilitated
ongoing physician support groups after the
model of "group dynamics" and "verbatim
seminars" as experienced in CPE training
programs. He has had an article published in
a journal of pastoral counseling entitled "Pastoral
Counselor led Physician Support Groups",
the aim of which is to encourage facilitators
of groups and physicians to work together.
He would be happy to send a copy of that article
to interested persons by e-mail. His e-mail
is: bill@zeckhausen.com.
Do you have thoughts about these reviews
you’d like to share with your colleagues?
Send an e-mail to info@PlainViews.org |